By Oluwatimilehin Fajemisin
Fresh debate has emerged over the future of Nigeria’s electoral system following a proposal by Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele to introduce a single six-year tenure for presidents and state governors after the 2027 general elections. The proposal, which would require constitutional amendments, is expected to be considered by the 11th Senate as part of broader reforms.
Speaking on the planned legislation, Bamidele argued that a single six-year term would allow elected leaders to focus more on governance and less on the political calculations associated with seeking re-election. He claims that the current system often forces presidents and governments to begin planning for second term shortly after assuming office, diverting attention from policy implementation and development goals.
Under Nigeria’s current constitutional arrangement, presidents and governors are elected for four-year terms and may serve a maximum of two terms. The proposed reform would replace that structure with a single, non-renewable six-year tenure. Supporters believe the change could reduce election-related spending, limit political distractions, and encourage leader to make long-term decisions without worrying about re-election campaigns.
However, the proposal is already getting mixed reactions among the political stakeholders and civil society groups. Many critics are arguing that a longer single term could reduce accountability by removing voters’ ability to reward or reject leaders through a second-term election.
Keep in mind that similar proposals have come up many times in the past but failed to secure sufficient legislative support. In 2024, the House of Representatives rejected a bill seeking a six-year single term for presidents and governors.
The proposal is expected to form part of wider constitutional review discussions in the coming months, along with debates on electoral reforms, governance restructuring, and other changes aimed at strengthening in Nigeria’s democratic system.
